Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Adolesc Health ; 73(4): 746-752, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410007

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite the fact that adolescence represents a distinct developmental period wherein dating and sexual relationships are emergent, much of what is known about substance use, sexual agreements, and sexual risk behaviors among adolescent sexual minority males (ASMM) is extrapolated from research on adults. This study tested associations between substance use and sexual risk behaviors among ASMM and examined whether relationship status and sexual agreements moderated these associations. METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey data were collected from 2,892 HIV negative ASMM aged 13-17 years between November 2017 and March 2020. All were sexually active with male partners and not on pre-exposure prophylaxis. A multigroup hurdle model predicted the occurrence and frequency of condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual partners. RESULTS: Non-monogamous ASMM were more likely to use illicit drugs and more likely to have CAS with casual partners compared with single ASMM and those in monogamous relationships. Among ASMM who had CAS at least once, those in relationships (both monogamous and nonmonogamous) had CAS more frequently than single ASMM. Binge drinking (odds ratio (OR) = 1.47, p < .001), cannabis (OR = 1.30, p < .001), and illicit drug use (including prescription drug misuse) (OR = 1.77, p < .001) were associated with the occurrence of CAS with casual partners but only binge drinking (rate ratio (RR) = 1.23, p = .027) and illicit drugs (RR = 1.75, p < .001) were associated with its frequency. DISCUSSION: While results aligned with adult studies in many respects, unlike adult sexual minority males, these findings suggest partnered ASMM-particularly those in nonmonogamous relationships-were at highest risk of substance use and associated sexual HIV transmission risk.


Subject(s)
Binge Drinking , HIV Infections , Illicit Drugs , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Male , Humans , Adolescent , United States/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Binge Drinking/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sexual Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Risk-Taking , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexual Partners
2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 8(12): e31237, 2022 12 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36306518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HIV disproportionately affects sexual minority men (SMM) in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine past HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) use and current and prior pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among a web-based sample of cisgender and transgender men who have sex with men. METHODS: In 2019, HIV-negative and unknown status SMM (n=63,015) were recruited via geosocial networking apps, social media, and other web-based venues to participate in a brief eligibility screening survey. Individuals were asked about past PEP use and current and prior PrEP use. We examined associations of demographics, socioeconomic indicators, and recent club drug use with PEP and PrEP use, as well as the association between past PEP use and current and prior PrEP use using generalized linear models and multinomial logistic regression. Statistical significance was considered at P<.001, given the large sample size; 99.9% CIs are reported. RESULTS: Prior PEP use was reported by 11.28% (7108/63,015) of the participants, with current or prior PrEP use reported by 21.95% (13,832/63,015) and 8.12% (5118/63,015), respectively. Nearly half (3268/7108, 46%) of the past PEP users were current PrEP users, and another 39.9% (2836/7108) of the participants who reported past PEP use also reported prior PrEP use. In multivariable analysis, past PEP use was associated with current (relative risk ratio [RRR] 23.53, 99.9% CI 14.03-39.46) and prior PrEP use (RRR 52.14, 99.9% CI 29.39-92.50). Compared with White men, Black men had higher prevalence of past PEP use and current PrEP use, Latino men had higher prevalence of PEP use but no significant difference in PrEP use, and those identifying as another race or ethnicity reported higher prevalence of past PEP use and lower current PrEP use. Past PEP use and current PrEP use were highest in the Northeast, with participants in the Midwest and South reporting significantly lower PEP and PrEP use. A significant interaction of Black race by past PEP use with current PrEP use was found (RRR 0.57, 99.9% CI 0.37-0.87), indicating that Black men who previously used PEP were less likely to report current PrEP use. Participants who reported recent club drug use were significantly more likely to report past PEP use and current or prior PrEP use than those without recent club drug use. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP use continues to be the predominant HIV prevention strategy for SMM compared with PEP use. Higher rates of past PEP use and current PrEP use among Black SMM are noteworthy, given the disproportionate burden of HIV. Nonetheless, understanding why Black men who previously used PEP are less likely to report current PrEP use is an important avenue for future research.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Illicit Drugs , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Transgender Persons , Male , Humans , Homosexuality, Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Internet
3.
J Behav Med ; 45(6): 975-982, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35916966

ABSTRACT

Regular HIV testing is an essential component of the HIV prevention and care cascade. Sexual minority males (SMM) account for most new HIV infections in the US and testing rates among SMM vary substantially across the lifespan. Research has largely overlooked the developmental context of HIV testing. The current study compared correlates of HIV testing among adolescents (aged 13-17; n = 1,641), emerging adults (aged 18-29; n = 50,483), early adults (aged 30-39; n = 25,830), middle adults (aged 40-64; n = 25,326), and late adults (65 and older; n = 1,452) who were recruited online. Overall, HIV testing rates were lowest among adolescent SMM. Having condomless anal sex in the past 3-months was a consistentpredictor of HIV testing across all age cohorts.The association between relationship status and frequency of HIV testing varied across ages. Being in a non-monogamous relationship (versus single) was associated with more frequent HIV testing among adolescent and emerging adult SMM , while being in a monogamous relationship (versus single) was associated with lower odds of HIV testing among early, middle, and late adults.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Adult , Male , Adolescent , Humans , Homosexuality, Male , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Longevity , HIV Testing
4.
AIDS Care ; 34(5): 670-678, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745409

ABSTRACT

Despite the prominence of self-efficacy as a predictor of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, relatively little work has examined domain-specific associations with steps in the care continuum or the possibility that substance use may have domain-specific associations with self-efficacy. This study analyzed data from a sample of 174 people living with HIV recruited through three clinics in the New York City metro area. Consistent with hypotheses, path analysis showed that appointments kept and viral load were each predicted only by their respective domain-specific self-efficacy components (i.e., self-efficacy for keeping appointments, B = 0.01, p = .04; and self-efficacy for taking ART medications, B = -0.02, p < .01). Path models also indicated domain-specific associations with substance use. Self-efficacy for keeping appointments was negatively associated with severity of drug use (B = -1.81, p < .01); meanwhile, self-efficacy for taking ART medications was negatively associated with severity of alcohol use (B = -0.52, p < .01). Accordingly, studies assessing barriers to retention in the HIV care continuum should conduct multi-domain assessments of self-efficacy for differential associations with specific behaviors. Furthermore, HIV care providers might consider screening for domain-specific self-efficacy to identify patients at risk of drop-out and tailoring interventions to various care continuum domains.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Continuity of Patient Care , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Medication Adherence , Self Efficacy , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Viral Load
5.
Addict Behav ; 122: 107018, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171584

ABSTRACT

The association between "illicit drugs" (e.g., cocaine/crack, methamphetamine, gamma-hydroxybutyrate-GHB, ketamine, and ecstasy) and condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual partners is well established for sexual minority men (SMM). Recent evidence from adult SMM has indicated that marijuana is associated with the occurrence of CAS with casual partners above and beyond illicit drug use. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate associations between CAS and the use of marijuana and illicit drugs in a sample of young SMM (aged 15-24). Participants (n = 578) completed an online survey assessing demographics, current PrEP prescription, age, marijuana use, as well as drug use and sexual behavior in the past 90 days. A hurdle model simultaneously predicted the occurrence of CAS as well as the frequency of CAS among those reporting it. Illicit drug use was associated with both the occurrence (OR = 2.26; p = .01) and frequency of CAS (RR = 1.63; p = .02). In contrast, marijuana use was associated with the occurrence (OR = 1.69; p = .01), but not the frequency of CAS (RR = 1.07; p = .74). Findings mirror recent observations in large samples of adult SMM. While the effect size of marijuana is more modest than illicit drug use, marijuana does have significant and unique associations with the occurrence of CAS. HIV prevention services for young SMM may therefore benefit from assessing and addressing marijuana use in the context of HIV sexual behavior.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , HIV Infections , Illicit Drugs , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Adolescent , Adult , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Risk-Taking , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Partners , Unsafe Sex
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 190(4): 681-695, 2021 04 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33057684

ABSTRACT

The use of digital technologies to conduct large-scale research with limited interaction (i.e., no in-person contact) and objective endpoints (i.e., biological testing) has significant potential for the field of epidemiology, but limited research to date has been published on the successes and challenges of such approaches. We analyzed data from a cohort study of sexual minority men across the United States, collected using digital strategies during a 10-month period from 2017 to 2018. Overall, 113,874 individuals were screened, of whom 26,000 were invited to the study, 10,691 joined the study, and 7,957 completed all enrollment steps, including return of a human immunodeficiency virus-negative sample. We examined group differences in completion of the steps towards enrollment to inform future research and found significant differences according to several factors, including age and race. This study adds to prior work to provide further proof-of-concept for this limited-interaction, technology-mediated methodology, highlighting some of its strengths and challenges, including rapid access to more diverse populations but also potential for bias due to differential enrollment. This method has strong promise, and future implementation research is needed to better understand the roles of burden, privacy, access, and compensation, to enhance representativeness and generalizability of the data generated.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Sexual Behavior , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Epidemiological Monitoring , HIV Infections/psychology , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 216: 108318, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between drug use and condomless anal sex (CAS) is well documented among sexual minority men (SMM). Less is known about whether this association generalizes to marijuana and across relationship status and sexual agreements groups (single, partnered monogamous, partnered open -outside partners permitted, and partnered monogamish -outside partners permitted when main partners are together). METHODS: A nationwide sample of SMM (N = 65,707) were recruited through a geosocial networking app between November 2017 and November 2019. Participants reported on drug use and instances of CAS with casual partners in the previous 30 days. RESULTS: Both marijuana and club drug use were associated with the occurrence of CAS with casual partners among single men. Only club drug use was associated with CAS frequency in this group. The association between marijuana and the occurrence of CAS did not differ significantly among monogamous men, while the associations between club drug use and the occurrence as well as frequency of CAS were significantly weaker. Meanwhile, the associations between club drug use and the occurrence as well as frequency of CAS did not differ significantly between single and non-monogamous (open and monogamish) subgroups; however, the association between marijuana and the occurrence of CAS was significantly weaker. CONCLUSIONS: Findings largely replicated the robust association between club drug use and CAS with casual partners. They support the assertion that marijuana use predicts sexual risk for some SMM subgroups. Finally, they illustrate the potential for relationship status - and sexual agreements - to contextualize associations between drug use and CAS.


Subject(s)
Illicit Drugs/adverse effects , Marijuana Use/adverse effects , Marijuana Use/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychology , Unsafe Sex/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Forecasting , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/psychology , Hallucinogens/adverse effects , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Humans , Male , Marijuana Use/trends , Unsafe Sex/prevention & control , Young Adult
8.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 216: 108260, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sexual minority men who use drugs have high sexual HIV transmission risk. Sexual interactions may also increase COVID-19 risk.This study compared marijuana use, other illegal drugs use (i.e. cocaine/crack, methamphetamine, MDMA/ecstasy, GHB, and ketamine) and sexual behavior with casual partners among sexual minority cismen active on social networking and dating applications before and during the COVID-19 epidemic. METHODS: This cohort-control study compared 455 adult respondents (surveyed May 6th to 17th, 2020) and a matched sample selected from 65,707 respondents surveyed pre-COVID. Participants were recruited on social networking and dating applications and completed surveys online. RESULTS: The proportion reporting marijuana use declined significantly in the COVID cohort (34.5 % versus 45.7 % pre-COVID,p < .001) as did their illegal drug use (11.0 % versus 22.9 % pre-COVID, p < .001). While the number of casual partners per month was stable, the proportion reporting condomless anal sex with casual partners declined significantly during COVID (26.4 % versus 71.6 % pre-COVID, p < .001). The effect of illegal drug use (excluding marijuana) on number of casual partners per month (aRR = 1.45 pre-COVID versus 2.84, p < .01) and odds of condomless anal sex (aOR = 2.00 pre-COVID versus 5.22, p = .04) were significantly greater in the COVID cohort. CONCLUSIONS: While the proportion of participants reporting drug use and condomless anal sex with casual partners declined in the COVID cohort, the association between drug use and sexual behavior was magnified. Sexual minority men who use drugs are significantly more likely to engage in sexual behaviors that place them at risk for HIV and COVID-19 transmission.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Illicit Drugs , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Risk-Taking , Sexual and Gender Minorities/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Marijuana Use , Methamphetamine , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Partners , Social Networking , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...